Search for: "Lucent Technologies, et al v. Dell Computer Corp" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm by Stefanie Levine
  The royalty amount assumes that the party would still be able to make a reasonable profit by selling the article in the open market.[5]  Generally, the determination of a reasonable royalty for accused patent infringement applies the well-established factors set forth in Georgia Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Microsoft and Dell Corporation, reversed the District Court’s summary judgement against an Alcatel-Lucent patent on web-technology, Federal Circuit, Spring 2008 Forest Laboratories and Lundbeck v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP finance),Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsICANN supports Google’s fight against domain-tasting: (Class 46),Global - PatentsSoftware patents and startup innovators: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property),Co-inventor: yes or no? [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]